부처별 재해위험지도 비교를 통한 기후위험지도 방향성 모색 연구

Many natural disaster are caused by climate change, and the climate crisis situation continues to grow. In order to respond to climate risks, it is necessary to establish measures through analysis of potential climate risk areas. Climate risks have much in common with natural disaster, except for the effects of rising temperatures and rising sea levels. Korea already has a well-established natural disaster response system, and hazard maps are being produced to respond to natural disasters. In this study, we sought to find the direction of climate risk maps needed to respond to climate risks by analyzing flood hazard map, drought vulnerability map, landslide hazard map, forest fire vulnerability map, and coastal hazard map. In the case of climate risk response, the results of analysis of climate hazard factors are basically used, so the information characteristics of the risk map needed to respond to the climate crisis were analyzed, the characteristics and limitations of each disaster risk map were analyzed. We found that the natural hazard maps prepared by each ministries evaluated vulnerabilities and risks on the basis of various risk factors of hazards. Most map and data update cycles were not specified, the evaluation results were provided administrative district and basin unit, and the subjects of map disclosure were different. Moreover, none of the maps when assessment vulnerabilities and risks used climate change scenarios. Considering the characteristics and limitations of the ministry-prepared natural hazard maps, any newly prepared climate risk map should evaluate vulnerabilities and risks according to various risk factors. Additionally, active data provision to people and updates are needed to utilize, and maps with a spatial resolution higher than the administrative district or basin unit should be provided. Finally, the climate risk map must be based on climate change scenarios (RCP/SSP). This study provides direction for climate risk map, and it is expected that local governments will be able to preemptively prevent such risks by establishing long-term climate crisis adaptation measures and an effective adaptation base.