TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing the quantitative understanding of adverse outcome pathways
T2 - current status, methodologies, and future directions
AU - Jeong, Jaeseong
AU - Gasparyan, Manvel
AU - Choi, Jinhee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/3/1
Y1 - 2025/3/1
N2 - An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework maps the sequence of events leading to adverse outcomes from chemical exposures, providing a mechanistic understanding often absent in traditional methods. The quantitative AOP (qAOP) advances AOP by integrating quantitative data and mathematical modeling, thereby providing a more precise comprehension of relationships between molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes. This review critically examines three primary methodologies: systems toxicology, regression modeling, and Bayesian network modeling, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and specific data requirements within toxicology. Through an analysis of current methodologies and challenges, this review emphasizes the integration of experimental and computational approaches to elucidate key event relationships and proposes strategies for overcoming limitations through standardized protocols and advanced computational tools. By outlining future research directions and the potential of qAOPs to transform chemical risk assessment, this review aims to contribute to the advancement of regulatory science and the protection of public health and the environment.
AB - An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework maps the sequence of events leading to adverse outcomes from chemical exposures, providing a mechanistic understanding often absent in traditional methods. The quantitative AOP (qAOP) advances AOP by integrating quantitative data and mathematical modeling, thereby providing a more precise comprehension of relationships between molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes. This review critically examines three primary methodologies: systems toxicology, regression modeling, and Bayesian network modeling, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and specific data requirements within toxicology. Through an analysis of current methodologies and challenges, this review emphasizes the integration of experimental and computational approaches to elucidate key event relationships and proposes strategies for overcoming limitations through standardized protocols and advanced computational tools. By outlining future research directions and the potential of qAOPs to transform chemical risk assessment, this review aims to contribute to the advancement of regulatory science and the protection of public health and the environment.
KW - Bayesian network
KW - key event relationship
KW - quantitative adverse outcome pathway
KW - regression model
KW - systems biology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219523149
U2 - 10.1093/etojnl/vgae063
DO - 10.1093/etojnl/vgae063
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39864436
AN - SCOPUS:85219523149
SN - 0730-7268
VL - 44
SP - 614
EP - 623
JO - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
JF - Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
IS - 3
ER -