TY - JOUR
T1 - Catalytic pyrolysis of chicken manure over various catalysts
AU - Shim, Jae Wang
AU - Pyo, Sumin
AU - Lam, Su Shiung
AU - Jae, Jungho
AU - Jeon, Byong Hun
AU - Khan, Moonis Ali
AU - Lin, Kun Yi Andrew
AU - Kim, Young Min
AU - Jung, Sang Chul
AU - Park, Young Kwon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/8/15
Y1 - 2022/8/15
N2 - In this study, non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis of chicken manure (CM) were investigated to understand the pyrolysis kinetics and product distribution of CM by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and pyrolyzer-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). TGA and the apparent activation energy changes, calculated using the Ozawa method, indicated that the decomposition of CM was comprised of four reaction stages. The 1st decomposition of CM was likely the decomposition of carbohydrates and lipids, followed by the 2nd decomposition of lignin at high temperatures. The 3rd decomposition was likely involving the decomposition of proteins. At the final stage, metal carbonates in the ash of CM were likely decomposed. Py-GC/MS analysis indicated a decrease in oxygenates, such as furfural, phenol, and fatty acid, after applying acid catalysts. Among the various acid catalysts, HZSM-5(Silica/Alumina = 30), having the strongest acid sites, showed the highest efficiency for the production of aromatic hydrocarbons, followed by HBeta(Silica/Alumina = 25), HY(Silica/Alumina = 30), natural zeolite, spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst (FCC), and bentonite. Although bentonite and spent FCC were ineffective, natural zeolite showed a catalytic effect on converting oxygenates to aromatic hydrocarbons. On the other hand, the content of a high molecular weight nitrile, hexadecanenitrile, was also increased. Commercial zeolites, HY(Silica/Alumina = 30), HBeta(Silica/Alumina = 25), and HZSM-5(Silica/Alumina = 30), led to higher aromatic formation efficiencies with less hexadecanenitrile formation than other catalysts. These efficiencies were increased significantly by varying the catalyst to CM ratio from 1/1 to 5/1, with a noticeable decrease in hexadecanenitrile.
AB - In this study, non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis of chicken manure (CM) were investigated to understand the pyrolysis kinetics and product distribution of CM by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and pyrolyzer-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). TGA and the apparent activation energy changes, calculated using the Ozawa method, indicated that the decomposition of CM was comprised of four reaction stages. The 1st decomposition of CM was likely the decomposition of carbohydrates and lipids, followed by the 2nd decomposition of lignin at high temperatures. The 3rd decomposition was likely involving the decomposition of proteins. At the final stage, metal carbonates in the ash of CM were likely decomposed. Py-GC/MS analysis indicated a decrease in oxygenates, such as furfural, phenol, and fatty acid, after applying acid catalysts. Among the various acid catalysts, HZSM-5(Silica/Alumina = 30), having the strongest acid sites, showed the highest efficiency for the production of aromatic hydrocarbons, followed by HBeta(Silica/Alumina = 25), HY(Silica/Alumina = 30), natural zeolite, spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst (FCC), and bentonite. Although bentonite and spent FCC were ineffective, natural zeolite showed a catalytic effect on converting oxygenates to aromatic hydrocarbons. On the other hand, the content of a high molecular weight nitrile, hexadecanenitrile, was also increased. Commercial zeolites, HY(Silica/Alumina = 30), HBeta(Silica/Alumina = 25), and HZSM-5(Silica/Alumina = 30), led to higher aromatic formation efficiencies with less hexadecanenitrile formation than other catalysts. These efficiencies were increased significantly by varying the catalyst to CM ratio from 1/1 to 5/1, with a noticeable decrease in hexadecanenitrile.
KW - Aromatic hydrocarbons
KW - Chicken manure
KW - Nitriles
KW - Pyrolysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129278148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124241
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124241
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129278148
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 322
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 124241
ER -