TY - GEN
T1 - Consequences of seismic excitation on slopes in soils with a tensile strength cutoff
AU - Park, Dowon
AU - Wang, Zhijie
AU - Michalowski, Radoslaw L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ASCE.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The yield criterion typically employed in slope stability analyses is the Mohr-Coulomb function with internal friction angle and the cohesion as the two strength parameters. The implication of this yield function is the presence of the tensile strength. However, it is doubtful whether geotechnical design should rely on the existence of tensile strength in soils, and models such as Cam clay do not allow uniaxial tensile strength in soils. It is demonstrated that eliminating tensile strength from the yield condition leads to a reduction in the stability factor. This is because the absence of tensile strength allows a larger variety of admissible failure surfaces. Seismic excitation produces the load that amplifies adverse consequences of the absence of the tensile strength. Two types of mechanisms are considered: translational and rotational. Examples of analyses with both types of collapse mechanisms are presented using the kinematic approach of limit analysis.
AB - The yield criterion typically employed in slope stability analyses is the Mohr-Coulomb function with internal friction angle and the cohesion as the two strength parameters. The implication of this yield function is the presence of the tensile strength. However, it is doubtful whether geotechnical design should rely on the existence of tensile strength in soils, and models such as Cam clay do not allow uniaxial tensile strength in soils. It is demonstrated that eliminating tensile strength from the yield condition leads to a reduction in the stability factor. This is because the absence of tensile strength allows a larger variety of admissible failure surfaces. Seismic excitation produces the load that amplifies adverse consequences of the absence of the tensile strength. Two types of mechanisms are considered: translational and rotational. Examples of analyses with both types of collapse mechanisms are presented using the kinematic approach of limit analysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018787877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784480458.030
DO - 10.1061/9780784480458.030
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85018787877
T3 - Geotechnical Special Publication
SP - 304
EP - 313
BT - Geotechnical Special Publication
A2 - Brandon, Thomas L.
A2 - Valentine, Richard J.
PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
T2 - Geotechnical Frontiers 2017
Y2 - 12 March 2017 through 15 March 2017
ER -