TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum for “Valorization of rice husk to aromatics via thermocatalytic conversion in the presence of decomposed methane” [Chem. Eng. J. 417 (2021) 129264] (Chemical Engineering Journal (2021) 417, (S1385894721008536), (10.1016/j.cej.2021.129264))
AU - Moogi, Surendar
AU - Lee, Jechan
AU - Jae, Jungho
AU - Sonne, Christian
AU - Rinklebe, Jörg
AU - Kim, Do Heui
AU - Lam, Su Shiung
AU - Show, Pau Loke
AU - Park, Young Kwon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/1/15
Y1 - 2024/1/15
N2 - Correction The authors regret the following errors in the original manuscript. On page 4, Table 4 should be replaced with the table given below. Table 4. Product yields (wt.%) over HZSM-5(38) under different pyrolysis media. Note that mean values are reported (n > 3). [Table presented] 2. On pages 3–4, the sentence “Although the yields of gas (∼24 wt%) and char (∼34 wt%) are hardly affected by the choice of reaction medium,” should be corrected to “Although the yields of gas (∼26 wt%) and char (∼34 wt%) are hardly affected by the choice of reaction medium,”. 3. On page 4, the sentence “For example, the CH4-D(650) environment provides 4.6% and 6% increases in the bio-oil yield” should be corrected to “For example, the CH4-D(650) environment provides 7.2% and 5.2% increases in the bio-oil yield”. Explanation for the error Because the reaction was performed using ex-situ type pyrolyzer, the char yield should be almost identical. Thus, in original Table 4, the average value of char yield was reported. However, for a clearer presentation of our experimental data, the authors have decided to revise Table 4. Accordingly, the re-computed gas and oil yields are provided in the revised Table 4, and relevant changes are made on the statements in Section 3.3. Furthermore, more pieces of information are added to the revised Table 4 for a clearer understanding. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience the authors might have caused to the readers of the journal. The correction does not alter the primary results, discussion, and conclusions of the article.
AB - Correction The authors regret the following errors in the original manuscript. On page 4, Table 4 should be replaced with the table given below. Table 4. Product yields (wt.%) over HZSM-5(38) under different pyrolysis media. Note that mean values are reported (n > 3). [Table presented] 2. On pages 3–4, the sentence “Although the yields of gas (∼24 wt%) and char (∼34 wt%) are hardly affected by the choice of reaction medium,” should be corrected to “Although the yields of gas (∼26 wt%) and char (∼34 wt%) are hardly affected by the choice of reaction medium,”. 3. On page 4, the sentence “For example, the CH4-D(650) environment provides 4.6% and 6% increases in the bio-oil yield” should be corrected to “For example, the CH4-D(650) environment provides 7.2% and 5.2% increases in the bio-oil yield”. Explanation for the error Because the reaction was performed using ex-situ type pyrolyzer, the char yield should be almost identical. Thus, in original Table 4, the average value of char yield was reported. However, for a clearer presentation of our experimental data, the authors have decided to revise Table 4. Accordingly, the re-computed gas and oil yields are provided in the revised Table 4, and relevant changes are made on the statements in Section 3.3. Furthermore, more pieces of information are added to the revised Table 4 for a clearer understanding. The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience the authors might have caused to the readers of the journal. The correction does not alter the primary results, discussion, and conclusions of the article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180092174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148004
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148004
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85180092174
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 480
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 148004
ER -