Abstract
Two different methods are used to evaluate the performance of the consumption-based asset pricing models to explain the cross-section of expected stock returns in conditional moments: one is to scale the returns, and the other is to model time-varying factor loadings, using instrument variables. Maximum correlation portfolios are constructed to directly impose restrictions on the time-series intercepts, especially in a model whose factors are not returns. The empirical results are as follow: the consumption-based models perform no better than the standard CAPM; adding the return on human capital as an additional risk factor does not help explain the cross-section; and the Fama- French three-factor model shows the best ability to lower the pricing error.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 695-722 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2009 |
Keywords
- Conditional moment
- Cross-sectional test
- Maximum correlation portfolio
- Multifactor CCAPM
- Time-series restriction