TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the conflicting relationship between U.S. National Parks and host communities
T2 - Understanding a community's diverging perspectives
AU - Lee, Jae Ho
AU - Matarrita-Cascante, David
AU - Xu, Ying
AU - Schuett, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors.
PY - 2018/10/13
Y1 - 2018/10/13
N2 - The growing importance of participatory and collaborative approaches in resource management has resulted in an increased emphasis on identifying the complex relationships between natural national parks and neighboring rural communities. Given the limited number of studies dealing with parks beyond rural areas, our exploratory case study examines how conflict stemming from diverse community stakeholders' perspectives and values in regard to the San Antonio Missions National Historical Park influences their involvement and attitudes toward park management. Thirty-two interviews were conducted and analyzed using a content-analysis methodology. Guided by the Progress Triangle conflict management framework, each stakeholder's views, interests, and aspirations associated with the missions were organized according to the framework's three dimensions: Substance, procedure, and relationship. The study findings discussed how stakeholders' varying perspectives regarding cultural resources influenced their interactions with urban historical national parks and their attitudes toward park management. Furthermore, how stakeholders can reconcile their differences through a collaborative approach for better park management was discussed.
AB - The growing importance of participatory and collaborative approaches in resource management has resulted in an increased emphasis on identifying the complex relationships between natural national parks and neighboring rural communities. Given the limited number of studies dealing with parks beyond rural areas, our exploratory case study examines how conflict stemming from diverse community stakeholders' perspectives and values in regard to the San Antonio Missions National Historical Park influences their involvement and attitudes toward park management. Thirty-two interviews were conducted and analyzed using a content-analysis methodology. Guided by the Progress Triangle conflict management framework, each stakeholder's views, interests, and aspirations associated with the missions were organized according to the framework's three dimensions: Substance, procedure, and relationship. The study findings discussed how stakeholders' varying perspectives regarding cultural resources influenced their interactions with urban historical national parks and their attitudes toward park management. Furthermore, how stakeholders can reconcile their differences through a collaborative approach for better park management was discussed.
KW - Collaboration
KW - Historical parks
KW - Park-community relationships
KW - Stakeholder perceptions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054900098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su10103667
DO - 10.3390/su10103667
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054900098
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 10
JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)
JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)
IS - 10
M1 - 3667
ER -