Examining the conflicting relationship between U.S. National Parks and host communities: Understanding a community's diverging perspectives

Jae Ho Lee, David Matarrita-Cascante, Ying Xu, Michael Schuett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The growing importance of participatory and collaborative approaches in resource management has resulted in an increased emphasis on identifying the complex relationships between natural national parks and neighboring rural communities. Given the limited number of studies dealing with parks beyond rural areas, our exploratory case study examines how conflict stemming from diverse community stakeholders' perspectives and values in regard to the San Antonio Missions National Historical Park influences their involvement and attitudes toward park management. Thirty-two interviews were conducted and analyzed using a content-analysis methodology. Guided by the Progress Triangle conflict management framework, each stakeholder's views, interests, and aspirations associated with the missions were organized according to the framework's three dimensions: Substance, procedure, and relationship. The study findings discussed how stakeholders' varying perspectives regarding cultural resources influenced their interactions with urban historical national parks and their attitudes toward park management. Furthermore, how stakeholders can reconcile their differences through a collaborative approach for better park management was discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3667
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Historical parks
  • Park-community relationships
  • Stakeholder perceptions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the conflicting relationship between U.S. National Parks and host communities: Understanding a community's diverging perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this