First stars as a possible origin for the helium-rich population in ω Cen

Ena Choi, Sukyoung K. Yi

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The most massive Galactic globular cluster ω Cen appears to have two, or perhaps more, distinct main sequences. Its bluest main sequence is at the centre of debate because it has been suggested to have an extremely high helium abundance of Y ~ 0.4. The same helium abundance is claimed to explain the presence of extreme horizontal branch stars of ω Cen as well. This demands a relative helium-to-metal enrichment of ΔY/ΔZ ~ 70; that is, more than one order of magnitude larger than the generally accepted value. Candidate solutions, namely asymptotic giant branch stars, massive stars and supernovae, have been suggested; but in this study, we show that none of them is a viable channel, in terms of reproducing the high value of ΔY/ΔZ for the constrained age difference between the red and blue populations. Essentially no populations with an ordinary initial mass function, including those candidates, can produce such a high ΔY/ΔZ because they all produce metals as well as helium. As an alternative, we investigate the possibility of the stochastic 'first star' contamination to the gas from which the younger generation of ω Cen formed. This requires the assumption that the Population III star formation episode overlaps with that of Population II. While the required condition appears extreme, very massive objects in the first star generation provide a solution that is at least as plausible as any other suggestions made before.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)L1-L5
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
Volume375
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Keywords

  • Galaxy: formation
  • Globular clusters: individual: ω centauri
  • Stars: formation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First stars as a possible origin for the helium-rich population in ω Cen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this