Abstract
We consider the international treaties on climate change as self-enforcing agreements. Applying non-cooperative game theory, we interpret the UN framework Convention on Climate Change as a Nash equilibrium outcome of an international abatement game where only domestic abatement is allowed. The Kyoto Protocol is a Nash equilibrium outcome of the game where flexibility mechanisms are introduced. We also show that credit discounting on foreign abatement can Pareto improve the welfare of all countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 247-260 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Environment and Development Economics |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2003 |