TY - JOUR
T1 - Inverse Association of Handgrip Strength With Risk of Heart Failure
AU - Laukkanen, Jari A.
AU - Khan, Hassan
AU - Lavie, Carl J.
AU - Voutilainen, Ari
AU - Kurl, Sudhir
AU - Jae, Sae Young
AU - Kunutsor, Setor K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the nature, magnitude, and specificity of the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and heart failure (HF) risk. Patients and Methods: Handgrip strength was assessed at baseline from March 1, 1998, to December 31, 2001, by use of a hand dynamometer in the Finnish Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease prospective population-based cohort of 770 men and women aged 61 to 74 years without a history of HF. Relative HGS was obtained by dividing the absolute value by body weight. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated with Cox regression models. We used multiple imputation to account for missing data. Results: During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 17.1 (11.3-18.3) years, 177 HF events were recorded. Handgrip strength was continually associated with risk of HF, consistent with a curvilinear shape. On adjustment for several established risk factors and other potential confounders, the HR (95% CI) for HF was 0.73 (0.59-0.91) per 1 SD increase in relative HGS. Comparing the top vs bottom tertiles of relative HGS, the corresponding adjusted HR was 0.55 (0.38-0.81). The association remained similar across several clinical subgroups. Imputed results were broadly similar to the observed results. Conclusion: Relative HGS is inversely and continually associated with the future risk of HF in the general population. Studies are warranted to evaluate whether HGS may be a useful prognostic tool for HF in the general population and to determine whether resistance exercise training may lower the risk of HF.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the nature, magnitude, and specificity of the association between handgrip strength (HGS) and heart failure (HF) risk. Patients and Methods: Handgrip strength was assessed at baseline from March 1, 1998, to December 31, 2001, by use of a hand dynamometer in the Finnish Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease prospective population-based cohort of 770 men and women aged 61 to 74 years without a history of HF. Relative HGS was obtained by dividing the absolute value by body weight. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated with Cox regression models. We used multiple imputation to account for missing data. Results: During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 17.1 (11.3-18.3) years, 177 HF events were recorded. Handgrip strength was continually associated with risk of HF, consistent with a curvilinear shape. On adjustment for several established risk factors and other potential confounders, the HR (95% CI) for HF was 0.73 (0.59-0.91) per 1 SD increase in relative HGS. Comparing the top vs bottom tertiles of relative HGS, the corresponding adjusted HR was 0.55 (0.38-0.81). The association remained similar across several clinical subgroups. Imputed results were broadly similar to the observed results. Conclusion: Relative HGS is inversely and continually associated with the future risk of HF in the general population. Studies are warranted to evaluate whether HGS may be a useful prognostic tool for HF in the general population and to determine whether resistance exercise training may lower the risk of HF.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103104762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.09.040
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.09.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 33775422
AN - SCOPUS:85103104762
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 96
SP - 1490
EP - 1499
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 6
ER -