Is grief fitting forever?

Some emotions have objects that are located in the past. These emotions are retrospective emotions. According to the Hardline View, once fitting, grief is fitting forever, because being locked in the past, the object of grief does not change. We argue that the argument in support of the Hardline View commits the fallacy of equivocation. When one of the premisses is disambiguated, the argument is either invalid or begs the question. We further argue that no non-question begging thesis about the unchangeability of the past object that we can think of can plausibly support this premiss. The hardliners’ argument is untenable. Lastly, we argue that the hardliners’ move to appeal to the background condition is not successful, because the hardliners have not justified their claim about the background condition for grief. We conclude that the hardliners have failed to show that once fitting, grief is fitting forever.