Modeling of protection schemes for critical surfaces under low pressure conditions: Comparison between analytical and numerical approach

Christof Asbach, David Y.H. Pui, Jung Hyeun Kim, Se Jin Yook, Heinz Fissan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nanoparticle contamination is one of the crucial issues for the semiconductor industry on the move towards structure sizes of 50 nm and below. In extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL), a likely successor to optical lithography, the masks cannot be protected by common pellicles. Different protection methods, such as a "thermophoretic pellicle" [L. Klebanoff and D. J. Rader, US Patent No. 6,153,044 (2000) and US Patent No. 6,253,464 B1 (2001)] have therefore been proposed to protect a face-down mask in an EUV scanner, which might be operated at 50 mTorr (6.7 Pa). In order to quantify the effectiveness of such protection schemes, we developed an analytical model that allows simple determination of the particle stopping distance as a function of particle and gas properties as well as a thermal gradient that might be employed to make use of a thermophoretic force in order to protect the mask. The analytical results indicate that drag force is most effective in slowing down particles, traveling at high initial velocities. Thermophoresis can add effective protection to particles traveling at low velocities and therefore decrease diffusional deposition. The results from the analytical model were used to check the accuracy of the discrete phase model in FLUENT for particle diameters between 100 and 500 nm and pressure levels between 10 mTorr (1.3 Pa) and 500 mTorr (66.7 Pa) (corresponding Knudsen numbers 407≤Kn≤102 000). The comparison results indicate that with no thermal gradient, the results agree very well with less than 2% deviation. If thermophoresis is included, the absolute deviation generally increases with increasing Knudsen number and with increasing temperature gradient. For a temperature gradient of 10 Kcm and a Knudsen number of 102 000 (p=10 mTorr, dp =100 nm), the deviation reaches almost 50% for 2 ms initial particle velocity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2419-2426
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vacuum Science and Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling of protection schemes for critical surfaces under low pressure conditions: Comparison between analytical and numerical approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this