TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling question-answer relations
T2 - the development of the integrative inferential reasoning comic assessment
AU - Blum, Alexander Mario
AU - Mason, James M.
AU - Kim, Jinho
AU - Pearson, P. David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - We constructed a new taxonomy for inferential thinking, a construct called Integrative Inferential Reasoning (IIR). IIR extends Pearson and Johnson's (1978) framework of text-implicit and script-implicit question-answer relations, and integrates several other prominent literacy theories to form a unified inferential reasoning construct, that is positioned as a type of cognitive processing disposition. We validated our construct using a researcher-made IIR instrument which was administered to 72 primary-grade students. Participants answered open-ended inference questions about various aspects of visual narratives presented in comic-strip format. We categorized participants’ responses as exemplifying one of the levels of IIR: text-implicit, script-implicit, or a combination of both. We used item response models to validate the ordinal nature of IIR, and its structure. Specifically, we fit Masters' (1982) partial credit model and obtained a Wright map, mean location data, and reliability estimates. Results confirmed that the IIR construct behaves ordinally. Additionally, age was found to be a reliable predictor of IIR, and item types (each modeled as a separate dimension) were found to have reasonable latent correlations between the dimensions. This research provides theoretical and practical insights for the pedagogy and assessment of narrative comprehension.
AB - We constructed a new taxonomy for inferential thinking, a construct called Integrative Inferential Reasoning (IIR). IIR extends Pearson and Johnson's (1978) framework of text-implicit and script-implicit question-answer relations, and integrates several other prominent literacy theories to form a unified inferential reasoning construct, that is positioned as a type of cognitive processing disposition. We validated our construct using a researcher-made IIR instrument which was administered to 72 primary-grade students. Participants answered open-ended inference questions about various aspects of visual narratives presented in comic-strip format. We categorized participants’ responses as exemplifying one of the levels of IIR: text-implicit, script-implicit, or a combination of both. We used item response models to validate the ordinal nature of IIR, and its structure. Specifically, we fit Masters' (1982) partial credit model and obtained a Wright map, mean location data, and reliability estimates. Results confirmed that the IIR construct behaves ordinally. Additionally, age was found to be a reliable predictor of IIR, and item types (each modeled as a separate dimension) were found to have reasonable latent correlations between the dimensions. This research provides theoretical and practical insights for the pedagogy and assessment of narrative comprehension.
KW - Cognitive processing disposition
KW - Comics
KW - Inferential thinking
KW - Item response models
KW - Narrative comprehension
KW - Scale validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080023888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11145-020-10026-4
DO - 10.1007/s11145-020-10026-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85080023888
SN - 0922-4777
VL - 33
SP - 1971
EP - 2000
JO - Reading and Writing
JF - Reading and Writing
IS - 8
ER -