Multiple realizations, diverse implementations and antireductionism

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

It has been debated what implications multiple realizability has for reductionism. I claim that more explicit attention needs to be paid to the distinction between multiple realizations of kinds and diverse implementations of laws. In this paper, I distinguish two different theses on the relations between multiple realization and diverse implementation: one thesis states that multiple realizations imply diverse implementations and the other states the converse. I claim that although antireductionism might turn out to be false if the first thesis is accepted, this "realization-based" antireductionism is not the only option for antireductionism. For the antireductionists who accept the second thesis, multiple realizations only provide evidence for diverse implementations. I defend this " implementation-based" antireductionism again Shapiro's dilemma. I argue that one horn of the dilemma does not pose any problem and that the other horn simply begs the question.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-244
Number of pages13
JournalTheoria
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Keywords

  • Antireductionism
  • Fodor
  • Multiple realizability
  • Multiple realization
  • Reductionism
  • Shapiro

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple realizations, diverse implementations and antireductionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this