TY - JOUR
T1 - On Referential Vagueness
T2 - A Comparative Study of English and American Sign Language
AU - Yoon, Suwon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. All Rights Reserved
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Yoon, Suwon. 2021. On referential vagueness: A comparative study of English and American Sign Language. Linguistic Research 38(1): 53-73. In addition to the widely known Free Choice Items (FCIs), there exists another type of anti-specific item, known as existential indeterminate or Referentially Vague Items (RVIs) such as some-X-or-other in English. Such polarity items are characterized to be rather semantically non-emphatic, and their non-emphaticness is modeled as referential vagueness as a speaker-based felicity condition of minimal, non-exhaustive variation. Both FCIs and RVIs are anti-specificity phenomena, relying on a speaker’s epistemic judgment, but distinct in that, whereas FCIs require exhaustive variation, RVIs require partial, non-exhaustive variation. However, the landscape of specificity in signed languages has been less well-defined. In this background, the main goal of current study is twofold: first, by identifying an RVI sign in ASL, equivalent to RVIs in English, I support the necessity of the notion of referential vagueness to correctly capture the meaning and distribution of non-emphatic, non-exhaustive NPIs occurring in nonveridical contexts; and second, I show how both English and ASL exhibit a remarkable case of semantic-o-pragmatic extension from anti-specificity (as RVIs) to anti-veridicality (as metalinguistic negation).
AB - Yoon, Suwon. 2021. On referential vagueness: A comparative study of English and American Sign Language. Linguistic Research 38(1): 53-73. In addition to the widely known Free Choice Items (FCIs), there exists another type of anti-specific item, known as existential indeterminate or Referentially Vague Items (RVIs) such as some-X-or-other in English. Such polarity items are characterized to be rather semantically non-emphatic, and their non-emphaticness is modeled as referential vagueness as a speaker-based felicity condition of minimal, non-exhaustive variation. Both FCIs and RVIs are anti-specificity phenomena, relying on a speaker’s epistemic judgment, but distinct in that, whereas FCIs require exhaustive variation, RVIs require partial, non-exhaustive variation. However, the landscape of specificity in signed languages has been less well-defined. In this background, the main goal of current study is twofold: first, by identifying an RVI sign in ASL, equivalent to RVIs in English, I support the necessity of the notion of referential vagueness to correctly capture the meaning and distribution of non-emphatic, non-exhaustive NPIs occurring in nonveridical contexts; and second, I show how both English and ASL exhibit a remarkable case of semantic-o-pragmatic extension from anti-specificity (as RVIs) to anti-veridicality (as metalinguistic negation).
KW - (Anti-)specificity
KW - ASL
KW - English
KW - free choice items
KW - metalinguistic negation
KW - polarity
KW - referentially vague items
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106619607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17250/khisli.38.1.202103.003
DO - 10.17250/khisli.38.1.202103.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106619607
SN - 1229-1374
VL - 38
SP - 53
EP - 73
JO - Linguistic Research
JF - Linguistic Research
IS - 1
ER -