TY - JOUR
T1 - On the nonlinearity of the catchment instantaneous response function
T2 - Insights obtained from dynamic wave modeling
AU - Paik, Kyungrock
AU - Jeong, Minyeob
AU - Kim, Jongho
AU - Kim, Dae Hong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - In the unit hydrograph theory, the catchment response function f to a unit rainfall is described invariant. However, real catchment response is nonlinear in that f varies with rainfall excess rate ie. In particular, the peak f(tp) and peak time tp of f are known to follow power functional relationships with ie. We investigated two fundamental knowledge gaps in the emergence of the nonlinearity: (1) the role of hydrodynamics and (2) the linkage with the linear convolution principle. Employing a sophisticated hydrodynamic model of the tRIBS-FEaST, the power-law nonlinearity was captured in simulations for a series of catchments. We found further that the time of concentration decreases with ie, again following a power law. Nevertheless, we found significant limitations in f obtained by deconvoluting S-hydrographs, as it fails to capture the known tendency of the growing skewness with ie. Further, the hydrographs reproduced with the linear convolution, even the nonlinearity is seen in f, deviates from the continuous simulation results. Alternatively, a series of f was directly simulated as hydrographs from the hydrodynamic model, initiated with varying initial water depth ho all over the catchment, but no additional water or rainfall imposed. This alternative method successfully reproduces not only the nonlinear peak variation but also the skewness variation with ho, which is attributed to the relaxation of the linear convolution framework.
AB - In the unit hydrograph theory, the catchment response function f to a unit rainfall is described invariant. However, real catchment response is nonlinear in that f varies with rainfall excess rate ie. In particular, the peak f(tp) and peak time tp of f are known to follow power functional relationships with ie. We investigated two fundamental knowledge gaps in the emergence of the nonlinearity: (1) the role of hydrodynamics and (2) the linkage with the linear convolution principle. Employing a sophisticated hydrodynamic model of the tRIBS-FEaST, the power-law nonlinearity was captured in simulations for a series of catchments. We found further that the time of concentration decreases with ie, again following a power law. Nevertheless, we found significant limitations in f obtained by deconvoluting S-hydrographs, as it fails to capture the known tendency of the growing skewness with ie. Further, the hydrographs reproduced with the linear convolution, even the nonlinearity is seen in f, deviates from the continuous simulation results. Alternatively, a series of f was directly simulated as hydrographs from the hydrodynamic model, initiated with varying initial water depth ho all over the catchment, but no additional water or rainfall imposed. This alternative method successfully reproduces not only the nonlinear peak variation but also the skewness variation with ho, which is attributed to the relaxation of the linear convolution framework.
KW - Dynamic wave model
KW - Nonlinearity
KW - Rainfall-runoff
KW - Unit hydrograph
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194868127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131413
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131413
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85194868127
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 637
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
M1 - 131413
ER -