TY - JOUR
T1 - SBR system for phosphorus removal
T2 - Linear model based optimization
AU - Kim, H.
AU - Hao, O. J.
AU - McAvoy, T. J.
PY - 2001/2
Y1 - 2001/2
N2 - Using a linear model, an optimization scheme for a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system for phosphorus removal was investigated. The objective was to minimize energy consumption by reducing the aeration cycle time (tair), while meeting the permit requirement (monthly average PO43- of 0.5 mg P/L). Based on the model prediction and error feedback information, the proposed scheme controlled the SBR system well both in the simulation and the real application by adjusting the tair to meet the effluent PO43- constraint. Mismatch between the model prediction and the measured data was compensated for. In the simulation, the average aeration cycle time was calculated to be 2.8 h, while in the real system it was 3.5 h. The actual optimized system provided excellent removal of phosphorus, COD, and ammonia with efficiencies of 93% (7.4 to 0.5 mg P/L). 90% (420 to 43 mg COD/L), and 98% (22.1 to 0.4 mg N/L), respectively. However, the effluent nitrate concentrations were relatively high (10 mg N/L), due to a slower endogenous nitrate respiration rate.
AB - Using a linear model, an optimization scheme for a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) system for phosphorus removal was investigated. The objective was to minimize energy consumption by reducing the aeration cycle time (tair), while meeting the permit requirement (monthly average PO43- of 0.5 mg P/L). Based on the model prediction and error feedback information, the proposed scheme controlled the SBR system well both in the simulation and the real application by adjusting the tair to meet the effluent PO43- constraint. Mismatch between the model prediction and the measured data was compensated for. In the simulation, the average aeration cycle time was calculated to be 2.8 h, while in the real system it was 3.5 h. The actual optimized system provided excellent removal of phosphorus, COD, and ammonia with efficiencies of 93% (7.4 to 0.5 mg P/L). 90% (420 to 43 mg COD/L), and 98% (22.1 to 0.4 mg N/L), respectively. However, the effluent nitrate concentrations were relatively high (10 mg N/L), due to a slower endogenous nitrate respiration rate.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035241855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:2(105)
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:2(105)
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035241855
SN - 0733-9372
VL - 127
SP - 105
EP - 111
JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States)
JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States)
IS - 2
ER -