Ten myths about US urban rail systems

Thomas A. Rubin, James E. Moore, Shin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

The proponents of rail transit have promulgated a set of stock arguments to help convince officials and the electorate that rail transit is a necessary component of a contemporary urban transportation system. These myths have gradually bored their way into conventional wisdom. We examine and dispel the following rail myths: (1) rail is cost-effective, (2) rail is the people's choice, (3) rail is fast transit, (4) rail is high capacity transit, (5) rail construction provides jobs, (6) rail promotes superior urban form, (7) rail will be paid for with non-local funds that cannot be used for other purposes, (8) rail will attract new riders to transit, (9) rail will decongest roads, and (10) there are no alternatives to rail.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-73
Number of pages17
JournalTransport Policy
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1999

Keywords

  • Ten myths
  • US urban rail systems
  • Urban transportation system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten myths about US urban rail systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this