TY - JOUR
T1 - The Development of Urban Cleanliness Evaluation Indicators through Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)
AU - Lee, Jeong Hyun
AU - Lee, Jai Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Korea Society of Waste Management. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This study aims to devise an evaluation indicator for the cleanliness of City A. This evaluation indicator seeks to enhance administrative processes and pinpoint cleaning services needing improvement. Currently, the evaluation criteria adopt the same measures across all districts, leading to potential result inaccuracies. To refine these criteria, officials from City A and environmental experts reviewed the cleaning and sanitation categories. Subsequently, these criteria were organized for a pairwise-comparison survey. Survey feedback was then assessed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), factoring in the weight of each element. The AHP analysis revealed that waste collection was the most influential factor, with a significance of 0.40 in the cleaning services category. Moreover, the “finishing work” had the predominant importance with a weight of 0.27. With the insights from the AHP, City A can set policy agendas to ameliorate conditions post-waste collection. It is recommended to incorporate evaluation components from City A, which carry distinct weights as determined by varied respondent groups.
AB - This study aims to devise an evaluation indicator for the cleanliness of City A. This evaluation indicator seeks to enhance administrative processes and pinpoint cleaning services needing improvement. Currently, the evaluation criteria adopt the same measures across all districts, leading to potential result inaccuracies. To refine these criteria, officials from City A and environmental experts reviewed the cleaning and sanitation categories. Subsequently, these criteria were organized for a pairwise-comparison survey. Survey feedback was then assessed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), factoring in the weight of each element. The AHP analysis revealed that waste collection was the most influential factor, with a significance of 0.40 in the cleaning services category. Moreover, the “finishing work” had the predominant importance with a weight of 0.27. With the insights from the AHP, City A can set policy agendas to ameliorate conditions post-waste collection. It is recommended to incorporate evaluation components from City A, which carry distinct weights as determined by varied respondent groups.
KW - Analytic hierarchy process
KW - Citizen satisfaction
KW - Cleanliness indicators
KW - Cleanliness services
KW - Urban cleanliness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196838520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.9786/kswm.2023.40.5.502
DO - 10.9786/kswm.2023.40.5.502
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196838520
SN - 2093-2332
VL - 40
SP - 502
EP - 522
JO - Journal of Korea Society of Waste Management
JF - Journal of Korea Society of Waste Management
IS - 5
ER -