TY - JOUR
T1 - There is No test–retest reliability of brain activation induced by robotic passive hand movement
T2 - A functional NIRS study
AU - Bae, Sungjin
AU - Lee, Yonghee
AU - Chang, Pyung Hun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Introduction: The basic paradigm of rehabilitation is based on the brain plasticity, and for promoting it, test–retest reliability (TRR) of brain activation in which certain area of the brain is repeatedly activated is required. In this study, we investigated whether the robotic passive movement has the TRR of brain activation. While active training has been shown to have TRR, but there still have been arguments over the TRR by passive movement. Methods: In order to test TRR, 10 repetitive sessions and various intervals (1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 23 days, 15 min, and 6 hr) were applied to five subjects, which had the same statistical power as applying two sessions to 50 subjects. In each session, three robot speeds (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 Hz) were applied to provide passive movement using the robot. The fNIRS signal (oxy-Hb) generated in the primary sensorimotor area (SM1) was measured on a total of 29 channels. At this time, we used activation maps and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values to examine the TRR and the effect of robot speeds and intervals on TRR. Results: As a result, activation maps showed prominent variation regardless of robot speeds and interval, and the ICC value (=0.002) showed no TRR of brain activation for robotic passive movement. Conclusion: The brain activation induced by the robotic passive movement alone has very poor TRR, suggesting that further enhancement is required to strengthen the TRR by complementing active user engagements.
AB - Introduction: The basic paradigm of rehabilitation is based on the brain plasticity, and for promoting it, test–retest reliability (TRR) of brain activation in which certain area of the brain is repeatedly activated is required. In this study, we investigated whether the robotic passive movement has the TRR of brain activation. While active training has been shown to have TRR, but there still have been arguments over the TRR by passive movement. Methods: In order to test TRR, 10 repetitive sessions and various intervals (1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 23 days, 15 min, and 6 hr) were applied to five subjects, which had the same statistical power as applying two sessions to 50 subjects. In each session, three robot speeds (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 Hz) were applied to provide passive movement using the robot. The fNIRS signal (oxy-Hb) generated in the primary sensorimotor area (SM1) was measured on a total of 29 channels. At this time, we used activation maps and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values to examine the TRR and the effect of robot speeds and intervals on TRR. Results: As a result, activation maps showed prominent variation regardless of robot speeds and interval, and the ICC value (=0.002) showed no TRR of brain activation for robotic passive movement. Conclusion: The brain activation induced by the robotic passive movement alone has very poor TRR, suggesting that further enhancement is required to strengthen the TRR by complementing active user engagements.
KW - activation map
KW - brain activation
KW - fNIRS
KW - intraclass correlation coefficient
KW - robotic passive movement
KW - test–retest reliability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089386675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/brb3.1788
DO - 10.1002/brb3.1788
M3 - Article
C2 - 32794359
AN - SCOPUS:85089386675
SN - 2157-9032
VL - 10
JO - Brain and Behavior
JF - Brain and Behavior
IS - 10
M1 - e01788
ER -